翻訳と辞書 |
Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering : ウィキペディア英語版 | Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering
''Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering'', 41 S. Ct. 172 (1921) is a United States Supreme Court case which examined the labor provisions of the Clayton Antitrust Act and reaffirmed the prior ruling in ''Loewe v. Lawlor'' that a secondary boycott was an illegal restraint on trade. The decision authorized courts to issue injunctions to block this practice, and any other tactics used by labor unions that were deemed unlawful restraints on trade.〔http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/tocnode?id=g9781577180999_chunk_g97815771809996_ss1-111〕 ==Background== In response to growing public pressure to control the unprecedented concentrations of economic power that developed after the American Civil War, Congress enacted the Sherman Antitrust Act (1890). It proscribed “unlawful restraints and monopolies” in interstate commerce as well as conspiracies to erect them. Soon thereafter federal judges began to employ the measure to combat efforts to unionize workers and to deny labor its traditional self‐help weapons. To counteract this “government by injunction,” the United States Congress included in the Clayton Act (1914) provisions that sought to preclude application of antitrust legislation against organized labor.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|